As a rule, use past tense to describe events that have happened.Such events include procedures that you have conducted and results that you observed.Imagine the difficulty faced by a non-native speaker who learns proper English and then reads the local rag or tries to make sense out of reports by "talking heads" on new shows.
As a rule, use past tense to describe events that have happened.Such events include procedures that you have conducted and results that you observed.Tags: Dental Hygiene Application EssayHillary Clinton Phd ThesisEssay On Compare ContrastBodies In Motion And At Rest EssayInsead Essays Word LimitFor And Against Essay LinkersPros And Cons Of Technology In Schools Essay
We simply do not use such writing styles in science. Superlatives include adjectives such as "huge," "incredible," "wonderful," "exciting," etc.
For example, "the mitochondria showed an incredibly large increase in oxygen consumption when we added uncoupling agent." Your definition of incredible might be different from that of someone else - perhaps a five fold increase is incredible to you, but not for the next person.
Use of the wrong verb tense, at best, is irritating to read and reflects poorly on the student's writing skills.
At worst, the reader can be confused as to what facts are already known and what was newly discovered in the actual study that is the subject of the paper.
We found that protein synthesis in sea urchin embryos treated with actinomycin D was considerably less than in untreated embryos.
This finding agrees with the model stating that protein synthesis in 24 hour sea urchin embryos is dependent on synthesis of new messenger RNA. I was thinking, if they know the inmates are in the trailer, why don't they just go in and get them?For example, do you really think it is necessary to define systolic blood pressure if your readership consists of physicians or cardiovascular physiologists?Technical writing differs from the writing of fiction, opinion pieces, scholarly English papers, etc. One way is in the use of superlatives and subjective statements in order to emphasize a point. For example, in your discussion you might write, "We felt that the fixative was bad, because we had difficulty finding flagella on our Chlamydomonas." Another researcher is unlikely to risk time and resources on the basis of your "feeling." On the other hand, you might write, "The percentage of cells with flagella was inversely proportional to the time they spent in fixative, suggesting that the fixative was causing cells to shed flagella." This is information that another scientist can use.What the article actually reported was that the two had hidden in a trailer which was driven out of prison, allowing them to escape.I grew up speaking and reading English (the American version, that is).Your readers can figure out to what field(s) your work applies.You need not define terms that are well known to the intended readership.When you write a paper related to literature, history, current events, and many other fields, direct quotes may be essential to a full discussion of the subject.In science, there is very rarely any call for a direct quote.Stick to the appropriate point, and include a reference to your source of background information if you feel that it is important.It isn't necessary to tell fellow scientists that your study is pertinent to the field of biochemistry.