Tags: Essay On My First Day In School For Class 7Deforestation Case StudyExplain The Significance Of Essay Type Test ItemsTemplate Research ProposalEssay On Description Of A PersonThe Homework Machine Activities
However, there are two bioethical principles at odds here: beneficence (doing what is best for the individual patient) and justice (doing what is most equitable for a society or group of patients).
However, if you give this tricky graduate job interview question some thought in advance, you should be able to identify a situation you’ve come across where there could be different points of view about the right course of action.
Here are some replies to avoid, as well as an example that could be opened up for further discussion in your interview.
You might say that your dilemma here is to balance wanting to help an individual (homeless person) with focusing your resources effectively.
If you have time, your first action might be to offer to buy a warm snack as that resource is targeted.
For this case, treating this single patient means that there will not be enough money to treat all of the other patients who come to the clinic over the course of the year.
In economic terms, we might say that his care is not cost-effective because for the same amount invested in supplying the clinic, we could prevent many more deaths or disability adjusted life years for a greater number of patients.1 is going to raise more questions for your interviewer than it answers.2 is just saying you’re a nice person – but that’s not answering the question.You are granted a fixed annual budget of 0,000 through your local public health department, and it is unlikely that you can obtain additional funding later in the year.Traditionally, you have used your entire budget for the past several years, which usually lasts from January until December. No one wants to be the candidate who, halfway through their interview, finds the recruiter furtively dialling 999 because they’ve just admitted a felony.Workplace dilemmas are typically more likely to be about potential grey areas than jailable offences: for example, what’s the trade-off between a good deal for the organisation and a good deal for the client…However, allowing a patient to die of a treatable condition feels wrong on many levels.Thinking through this further, we must look closely at our values as a country and a health system: thanks to EMTALA, we ensure that no patient will ever be allowed to die of an emergency condition while in a hospital; thus, we value saving people from imminent, preventable death.Where’s the dilemma in generally doing the right thing and avoiding doing the wrong thing?3 has potential, but doesn’t go into the issues in enough depth.