The most significant reason that makes nuclear energy preferable to solar energy is that it is clean and does not produce gaseous emissions that may be harmful to the environment.
For example, nuclear energy does not emit any sulfur, toxic or greenhouse gases that may be disastrous to the environment.
This example provides a clear indication that whereas solar energy is free, it may be costly in the long run in terms of buying the solar panels and installation equipments (Falk 345).
Besides, the transparency within the nuclear industry has made it highly attractive.
Supporters of the use of solar energy argue that investing in the nuclear industry is expensive and relatively inefficient.
Besides, building reactors is costly, uneconomical, and ineffective compared to other methods of power generation.
Quite often, when states go to war, they seek to use nuclear weapons for military purposes and uphold their interests by safeguarding their security.
This is done to quell other countries from seeking nuclear weapons and strengthen the security prone areas instead of encouraging the adoption of nuclear power.
Therefore, the opponents of nuclear sources of energy argue that the continual use of radioactive materials to produce nuclear energy is deadly to the human population and the environment.
However, the proper use of nuclear energy has numerous and significant security benefits.